# Feedwatch

> A budgeting app where bank-connection reliability is the headline feature — multi-aggregator failover, visible per-account connection health, and categorisation rules that persist. Currently in development; waitlist open. The research behind it is published in full.

## Key findings (July 2026 study)

- Corpus: 4,179 one-to-three-star reviews across personal finance and budgeting apps.
- 113 reviews complain specifically about bank-feed or aggregator failures — the highest concentration of any niche measured.
- Billing and cancellation complaints: 10.1%, the highest rate of any niche in the study.
- Low-star share by app: Quicken 64%, PocketGuard 56%, EveryDollar 48%, YNAB 47%, Copilot 41%, Monarch 40%.
- Ads and upsell pressure: 8.3%, reflecting free tiers monetising around a broken core function.

## Stated limitations

- 41% of substantive reviews were not matched by the complaint taxonomy; all percentages are floors, not true rates.
- App store reviews over-represent the daily user; buyer voice on G2 and Capterra is not represented.
- No recency weighting; some cited failures may already be fixed.

## Pages

- [Home](https://feedwatch.district-ai.com/): product summary, evidence, waitlist.
- [Research](https://feedwatch.district-ai.com/research/): method, complaint themes, per-app rates, limitations.

## Status

In development. Not released. No trial, no pricing, no download. The waitlist collects an email address only.

## Citation

Feedwatch (2026). "Feedwatch research — what the complaints actually say." https://feedwatch.district-ai.com/research/